Casey Anthony: Motion on Party Photos to be Heard
Please note that this post is from 2010. For the most current updates on the Casey Anthony trial, please see my homepage.
Lots going on in the trial of accused murder Casey Anthony.
Next up on the docket, Judge Belvin Perry will hear quite a few new defense motions including one to keep the infamous Anthony party photos from being presented to an (out of town) jury.
Do you think these photos are relevant? Why or why not?
Credit: WDBO
From WDBO:
The racy photos show Casey and her friends engaged in drunken debauchery. Some show Casey partying in an Orlando night club during the time that her daughter was missing.
Defense attorneys say viewing the pictures would cause jurors to form a prejudice.
“It has an incredible, powerful influence on the jurors,” said San Diego defense attorney Allen Bloom.
Explore posts in the same categories: UncategorizedTags: Anthony Body Found, Anthony Family, Anthony May 10, Anthony Party Photos, Anthony Party Pics, Anthony Party Pictures, Anthony Racy Photos, Anthony Text Message, Anthony Text Messages, Anthony Trial, Anthony Update, Brad Conway, Casey Anthony, Casey Anthony News, Caylee, Caylee Anthony, Caylee Anthony News, Caylee Body Found, Caylee May 10, Caylee Update, Cindy Anthony, George Anthony, Jose Baez, Judge Belvin Perry, Judge Perry, Lee Anthony, Leonard Padilla, Missing Child, Missing Girl, Roy Kronk, Tim Miller, Todd Black, Tot Mom
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.
Kreuzer's Korner 
May 10, 2010 at 11:21 am
By all means the ones that were taken AFTER June 15th up to the famous 911-any form of media is relevant during that time to show where her priorities were as her daughter lay rotting in a garbage bag a few houses away from the bed she should have been tucked into.
May 10, 2010 at 11:31 am
I agree, the photos are very important. It shows that Casey Anthony was not out looking under every rock trying to find her missing daughter. The photos before June 16th do not matter.
May 10, 2010 at 11:48 am
The photos need to be seen…..it’s the whole ball of wax for the prosecution.
What is it they say.???……..a picture is worth a thousand words???
Not introducing them only adds to the crime in my opinion.
May 10, 2010 at 12:10 pm
If this picture above was taken after the positively established time ddof the death of Caylee Marie Anthony, Yes! However, I have in the past noticed that it is considered that Casey has her hand on the breast of the other girl. I do not see
that. It is only in the height of her arm and hand that it appears so, I do not think
it is a fact. As far as the mini dressing, That is what all the girls wear, many shorter than hers. mothers all around me, pushing their babies are in mini skirts
and sports bras all day long. Perhaps if she was really looking for Caylee she would have better been dressed in jeans and world have had an expression of concern, a more serious demeanor. When did Caylee die and what is the date of the above picture.
May 10, 2010 at 12:11 pm
Agree. Um, aren’t the Photos during this SPECIFIC time-period considered “Evidence”, in a relative portion of the “Whole Picture”……
(I don’t see why The Defense should feel so threatened by these Photos now— in every previous reported and televised “Explanation”, they claimed this Behavior was due to Casey’s “Grief” over Caylee’s “Disappearance”, and “her way” of trying to overcome and deal with it. Soooooo, Prove it.)
May 10, 2010 at 12:20 pm
(P.S: Evidentally, as I was writing my above Comment, *Zelda* and *OneOp’s* hit the Page first….
Just want to note that my first word (“Agree”) was actually in follow-up to the first two Comments on the Page).
May 10, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Definitely! They should be admitted as they show her state of mind. The photos do not provide proof that she murdered her child, but, it does demonstrate that she wasn’t looking for her as she claims. It also gives an insight into the people in her life. JMO
May 10, 2010 at 2:46 pm
according to the duhfence the photos After june 15 show prejudice. excuse me. what prejudice? kc stated that she was looking for her “missing” daughter. was precious Caylee having a high oh time at the bar?????? no, she was in the woods, knee deep in water, in a garbage bag, for God’s sake and sleazy was the one having a high oh time earning the title, MOTY. It is what it is.
May 10, 2010 at 4:05 pm
I think Mr Ashton and Ms Burdict should show a montage of pictures describing how Ms Anthony went looking for her child during the 31 days. Dancing at Fusion, getting a tattoo, wearing the American Flag, etc. They should notate the date and what she was doing. In between partying did she put any miles on her car looking? Or was she with Jeff Hopkins enjoying a wedding celebration in Jacksonville?
Expose her lies through pictures.
May 10, 2010 at 6:50 pm
I agree that the pictures should be admitted..They show her lack of concern for the where abouts of her child,when she claimed that the Nanny took her..(which of course we all know, there never was one to begin with…Any photo of Casey after the 15th of July should be permitted.Casey didn’t care then and she still seems not to care..
May 10, 2010 at 8:58 pm
honeygog, i believe it was called “ugly coping”. the ugly (kc) i understand—-coping—not so much.
May 10, 2010 at 9:00 pm
honeygog/honeydog sorry
May 11, 2010 at 12:06 am
*Midget48*~ I couldn’t recall the “Term” used, and, rather than get it wrong, I just tried to explain it. Thanks.
(According to JVM’s Legal Panel tonight, the Photos are very relevant, and believed will be admitted….
We’ll see.)
May 11, 2010 at 3:36 am
For many psychopaths, violence has a calming effect.
May 12, 2010 at 12:08 am
The photos should be admitted. They are only prejudicial to the defense because they show Casey in her true glory. A photo cannot lie.
June 6, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Who better than the jury to decide if Casey is potrayed in these pictures “looking” for her daughter Caylee after June 16th as she told investigators that she was in the nightclub. As far as the pictures prior to that I do believe that if the defense were to contend that Casey Anthony was a good mother, if their are pictures of the evening that friends contended to investigators that they told Casey that, those pictures are absolutely relevant. Because otherwise all you have is the subjective opinion of the witness as opposed to a picture which potrays the environment that Casey’s friends refer to.
June 6, 2010 at 2:45 pm
that made absoutely no sense at all. Sorry. I mean that in the police interviews there were witnesses that speak of an evening where friends told Casey that whereever they all were was not an appropriate environment for Caylee. ie.) If Casey had Caylee in some place where others advised Casey that it was unfit to have a child there. The is relevant if the defense wants to contend that Casey Anthony was a good parent. Apparently she wasn’t always and that is relevant.