Michael Jackson: Not The Biological Father of Kids?

I’ve heard this a lot in the past couple days but now it appears that sources have told TMZ that Michael Jackson did not donate sperm  for any of his children and that Debbie Rowe was merely a surrogate.

From Fox News:

According to a report in Us magazine, Jackson’s dermatologist and Rowe’s former boss Arnold Klein is the biological father to Prince and Paris.

“He is the dad,” a Jackson insider told Us. “He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth.”

In the case of Jackson’s youngest son Blanket, TMZ reports that the surrogate was never told that the baby was for Jackson.

A custody battle for the Jackson children has already begun, with his mother Katherine Jackson winning temporary guardianship. A hearing is set for August 3.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

One Comment on “Michael Jackson: Not The Biological Father of Kids?”

  1. Honeydog0629 Says:

    Well, Whatever. As with most Celebrities of this Caliber, all the “Secrets” come-out when they Die. Personally, I don’t care that Michael and Debbie Rowe created and kept-up this Facade for the Public— It was their Business, for Michael’s own Personal Reasons, which he was certainly Entitled to like anybody else, and was surely no Crime in itself. My only Thoughts now are…… I wonder if the “Real” Father will ever Consider, at any point in Time, wanting his two Biological Children, even though Michael’s name is on the Birth Certificate and the Children were Born during Michael and Debbie’s
    “Marriage”…., The Effects on these two Children having been with, and always knowing Michael as their Father, as they will surely learn the Shocking Truth…., and, the Effects on the Youngest One who is Faced with a “Double Whammy” of not only Michael not being his Father, but of not knowing who his Mother is. It’s Sad that, for all Michael’s Good and Loving Intentions, these Children are left in what will surely be a long, drawn-out, complex, and perhaps dirty “Shuffle”, while their Innocent Lives are being Traumatized, and their Future is being “Decided for Them”. In my Opinion, I think that their “Nanny” should remain with all of them, no matter to Whom or Where they go, as it seems there is a very Strong Bond and Affectionate Relationship between them. She’s the only “Mother” they’ve known, and I would Hate to see that End. All in all, I’m just Hoping for the Best Possibe and Happiest Ending here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers